His drama is unlike both in that for the most part it rejects a religious framework.
First, directors stage the play according to their own styles, using various props and costumes while suggesting numerous interpretations of characters.
Secondly, individual actors read the lines differently, using diverse voice inflections, gestures, and body language to give each interpretation its own style. Miller also provides yet another opportunity for variety, not just for the director and actors, but also for the audience and reader.
Lengthy exposition pieces that are not glossed as stage directions periodically appear in the written play. For example, at the beginning of Act I, Miller provides stage directions for the set, props, and position of Parris and Betty on stage.
However, Miller also includes an extensive psychological profile of Parris prior to beginning the action of the play.
Before Parris speaks, a narrator says that "in history he cut a villainous path, and there is very little good to be said for him. In addition to historical background on significant characters, the interruptions also include social commentary within the exposition.
The question arises whether or not a director should include these narrative sections, some of which are four pages long, within the play itself. At first glance, it appears that they are to be included within the actual production. If so, then a narrator character must read the narrative sections to the audience.
Therefore, the narrative sections should clearly serve only as a tool to provide directors and actors with background information. The explicative passages allow directors and actors to focus on character motivation, providing them a better understanding of the characters and the historical period.
Characters are more engaging because a genuine basis for tension between them exists. For example, obvious tension exists between Thomas Putnam and several other characters in the play, especially Francis Nurse. An actor playing Thomas Putnam must create a persona driven by greed.
These background passages result in a more effective portrayal of greed and a more believable character. Within the exposition sections Miller addresses the reader directly, in the comfortable, reliable voice of a trusted narrator. As a result, the reader internalizes the information and responds to the characters and their actions based upon it.
The narrator tells the reader that the real Putnam accused a large number of people during the trials, often as a method of retaliation or personal gain. Although the narrator does not finish the suggestion — he only says, "especially when" — the reader automatically expects Putnam to falsely accuse someone in the play.Find great deals on eBay for arthur miller essays.
Shop with confidence.
Skip to main content. eBay: Critical Essays on Arthur Miller (ExLib, NoDust) by James J. Martine See more like this. Arthur Miller; a collection of critical essays-ExLibrary See more like this.
The Theater Essays of Arthur Miller. Pre-Owned. The section concludes with Paul T. Nolan's comparison of Menagerie and Arthur Miller's After the Fall as examples of a new dramatic genre - the memory play. The collection of essays assembled by Parker is particularly valuable at this time.
Critical Essays Arthur Miller's Narrative Technique in The Crucible Bookmark this page Manage My Reading List Each stage production of . Arthur Miller; a collection of critical essays by Robert Willoughby Corrigan, , Prentice-Hall edition, in English. Harold Clurman, "Arthur Miller's Later Plays," in Arthur Miller: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Robert W.
Corrigan, Prentice-Hall, , pp. Harold Clurman, "Arthur Miller's Later Plays," in Arthur Miller: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Robert W. Corrigan, Prentice-Hall, , pp.