Compare the ways the contrast between two fathers and their daughters are made interesting in romeo

The centrality of the Friar's role suggests a notable failure of parental love. Romeo and Juliet can't tell their parents of their love because of the quarrel between the two families.

Compare the ways the contrast between two fathers and their daughters are made interesting in romeo

Hire Writer In my opinion, Baz Luhrmanns film is aimed at a younger audience, teenagers for instance, due to the slang, comedy, hip modern feel, and gun violence culture, which seems to be a growing part of our world today.

Also, it is set in twentieth century Mexico City, trying to create a modern Miami sort of feel. However, Franco Zeffirellis version, set in the fifteenth century, is aimed at an older audience, adults and the elderly in particular in my opinion.

One of the main differences between the two films, apart from the time set, is the opening scenes. The Zeffirelli version has quite a slow opening, and takes a while to get in to the action, in contrast to a fast and furious opening of Luhrmanns film.

Obviously one big difference is the time periods of each movie. Special effects is a key feature in the latest film — explosions and gunfights giving an action packed modern twist. In the older version there was no use of special effects, therefore, the movie totally relied on great acting to be convincing.

Let's Get Started

In keeping with the sets and effects, the costumes too are very different. On one hand, Zeffirellis film displays historically accurate clothing, tunics, doublet and hose, and harlequin costumes.

These were all typical clothing types in the early Renaissance period. Another major difference in the films that is seen often throughout the Lurhmann film is the actors smoking.

Something as simple as a lit cigarette in ones hand adds a cool and modern feel to the film. Romeo and Juliet - Shakespeares play Essay There is also a contrast between the choice of weapons and methods of transport.

There is almost no comparison between these two factors. Zeffirelli used again historically accurate swords and daggers, bow and arrows, horseback, foot, and horse and carriage. However, the use of guns, explosive effects, sporty kitted cars, helicopters, and speedboats contrasts with this in the modern film.

Example; space ships and flying cars, obviously in the future, modern cars, bikes, planes, somewhere within the last few decades, horseback, boat, carriage, back in the past.

The techniques of filming are also different. A good example of the different techniques is at the beginning of the two films, the street fights.

Compare the ways the contrast between two fathers and their daughters are made interesting in romeo

In the Lurhmann version, at the petrol station there is a lot of use of long and short shots, use of close-up, aerial shots, and low angle shots, which the Zeffirelli version also uses, but also there are other techniques like speeded-up film, freeze-frames, wipes and quick zoom which Zeffirelli does not use.

In the street fight in the town market, Zeffirelli uses a highly mobile camera in cinema verite style, and there is a lot of use of aerial shots, and close-ups.

Compare the ways the contrast between two fathers and their daughters are made interesting in romeo

There was one thing I noticed in both the films, the use of when introducing Tybalt. Here the camera starts off low, looking at the feet and legs of the person, then slowing raising up the the face as they introduce the character. This is a good technique to use to introduce an important character as the audience will know it must be someone important from the filming technique.

Use of sound also differs. In the prologue in Zeffirellis version there is calm orchestral music, relaxing and slow, and also the voiceover of Laurence Olivier in an old fashioned style. Aerial shots slowly panning across the hazy morning of Verona city are used here also. However,in the Luhrmann version, very intense modern opera music is used to build the heat and the voice over is done in a more serious way, in a less calm and old voice as Laurence Olivier.

A lot of wipes, quick zooms, close ups, and speeded up film is used here also. Music and sound effects is used throughout both versions. In Lurhmanns, there is spaghetti western style music to go with the gunplay and also the operatic music coming back in after the petrol station goes up in flames due to the gunfight at the beginning between the montagues and capulets.

In the Zeffirelli version there is less music to act as background sound, instead, there is sound effects like a busy market place, the sounding of the bell, and screaming and shouting as the fight breaks out. The sound of the bugels when the prince enters instantly lets the viewers know he is an important person, this is a very good sound effect used.

Sound effects in Lurhmanns version are very urban, like explosions gunshots, helicopter blades, whereas Zeffirelli has used more the peaceful and natural sounds. The images in the Luhrmann version are modern and media orientated.

This is why he begins the prologue with the television set, on the news, to give the viewer the instant impression that the film is set in the modern world, with media being an important factor. Other interesting modern images you can notice in the Luhrmann version include fireworks at the party, and smoking.

A lot of the characters including Romeo are sometimes seen smoking a cigarette. On the other hand, the pictures presented to the audience in the Zeffirelli version are very old, swords instead of guns, horse instead of car etc.

The actors in the Luhrmann version, however, are well known Leonardo DiCaprio, and not so well known Claire Danes who were 21 and 17 years old when the film was being made. They are different to them in the Zeffirelli version because the acting is more exaggerated, less traditional, and more stylized.Mar 29,  · Compare And Contrast Mother And Father Comparison Between my Mother and Father We always think that for a happy marriage, the two persons should share many similarities.

However, heap always curious about how they can hardly have a quarrel for they are two really contrasting people.

The "old" version (1968) - Setting: Verona, Italy, Time: renaissance

Their differences in physical . Get an answer for 'Compare and contrast the relationships between the mother and each of her daughters, Dee and Maggie, in ''Everyday Use.''I'm having trouble finding similarities between the.

The Question of Desire: A Comparison of Love in Shakespeare by Justin R. Brady Introduction. Romeo and Juliet and A Midsummer Night’s Dream give rise to a great deal of commentary on the topics of desire and love.

When considering the words and actions of the characters within these plays, one can arrive at two very differing conclusions about love, complicated by the fact that one play is a. Compare the ways the contrast between two fathers and their daughters are made interesting in ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and ‘An Inspector Calls’ Compare and Contrast the Ways in Which Shakespeare and Webster Present Hamlet and Bosola as Tragic Heroes.

Romeo's language tells the readers that he's already deeply in love with her, as he sees her above all others in beauty and worth. The poetic tools used when speaking of Juliet (similes, metaphors) show how affectionate Romeo is towards her. Compare the ways the contrast between two fathers and their daughters are made interesting in ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and ‘An Inspector Calls’ Words Apr 23rd, 7 Pages ‘Romeo and Juliet’ was written in the 16th century by William Shakespeare and ‘An Inspector Calls’ was written nearly years later in the early 20th century by J.B.

Priestley.

Romeo and Juliet movies and play comparison | HubPages